Idolatry of the State

The spirit of jealousy: self-deception as to what is legitimately the property of others and becomes, by feeding one's covetous nature, the object of that degree of unbridled lust described in James 1:14 and Colossians 3:5.

Observe how this can be socialized: the adelphic apostle says it well in 3:14 ff -- But if you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. This wisdom does not descend from above, but [is] earthly, sensual, demonic. For where envy and self-seeking [exist], confusion and every evil thing [are] there...

Paul Obvious of Brisbane shares this, among a long list of comments on an excellent article in the Australian
"...to you in the Labor Party, remember why you formed - to celebrate the dignity of LABOUR ie work. Not the dignity of permanent, un-necessary welfare. From the Bible: the Devil makes work for idle hands. And he is busy in London."

On one of my older posts I considered how the Gettysburg address's most famous half-line "of the people, by the people and for the people" is derived from a time of turmoil in England that Lincoln had likely pondered long.

If the government becomes the people's god, then the role-reversal can be seen to entail the three aspects the great John Wyclif may have drawn, in his 1385 preface to the Bible he and his colleagues sought to bring forth for the deliverance of the English, from the words of Paul the apostle in Romans 11:36 -- For of Him and through Him and to Him [are] all things, to whom [be] glory forever.

The people are to be the government's god in that we are its creator, its sustainer and its judge.

As we look on the arousal of a false spirit of jealousy in England, may we not be - in this our "formerly" Christian country - may we not be made legitimately jealous of the fidelity of our government by its usurpation through the limitless guile of these statists?

Haploid

"Memphis, we've got a problem"

Today I heard a disturbing bit of news. The NAACP has thrown in its lot with the homosexuals. I knew that the latter were creating their closest possible facsimile of a legitimate ethnic group many years ago, but to learn that the ruse has been adopted by the legitimate heir to a force of moral impetus strikes me with considerable reflective glare.

On what does this piercing light shine?

Well, the shining of God's glory through an Elijah gets mighty tempting to a Gehazi, doesn't it?

Dr. King was a kind man and not a judgmentalist. I want to follow his example myself. All that I can think to say now is that a sanitation worker's labor initiative that was motivated by a legitimate desire to promote African-Americans' civil rights, so many years ago, doesn't have a lot of grace to impart to today's Anti-Walker crowd of any color.

TAKEN AS "ad hominem"

The President's speech last night was a moral harangue based on a false premise - as though the shot at Gabrielle Giffords were akin to what he and his allies take as ad hominem - the arguments of principle leveled against their policies.

It then becomes manifest that they aspire to a government not of law, but of men!

False Representation

    I've gotten the ad now on my Facebook streamer column:

    Michael Prell has cleverly coded the title of his book "Underdogma" -

    to proclaim aloud that our culture war is being fought against an adversary that uses deceptive means to its goal of making the Liberal Left subculture (see my first blog entry at the very bottom of this page) the dominant force in American society.

    We can all come up with catch phrases. But we have to build a mutual understanding on observable patterns that allow comparative analysis, and prove the paradigm matches up repetitively in disparate fields of observation.

    There's a huge depth to this, that great philosophers have told about - when Jesus said, "Blessed are the poor," He began a revolution in social studies. To practice that blessedness is to break with stratification from whatever source it purports to derive its justice.

    But what is happening in the United States since the first days of Obama's Presidential campaign is, in fact, something "unprecedented" in that the apparatus of governance - that Lincoln deliberately counterposed to all its historical and contemporary congeners at Gettysburg - is no longer being recognized as to have been derived by cause-and-effect from the actions of them who signed the Declaration of Independence and ratified the Constitution.

    Our representatives in the Legislature, as of the last 40 days, have practiced patently false representation, and have gotten the full approval of both the Executive branch for doing it, and the adulation of a fawning press.

    For over 14 years I've studied this phenomenon that Michael Prell dubs "underdogma" as a spiritual archetype, under the rubric of "the spirit of jealousy."

    Starting with a postulate that there is a significant difference between envy and jealousy, I established that a clear Biblical pattern was recorded in 1 Kings 20-22 to exemplify what becomes of a man like Ahab who submits his identity to the seduction of a Jezebel.

    Envy of (or call it what the Decalogue does, coveting) that which is recognized to belong to someone else can be transformed in a weak, undirected soul into jealousy, to treat the object of unrestrained desire as if it belonged to himself.

    In the Torah a process of adjudicating the jealousy of a husband is described by which he legitimately brings his grievance to the priests for divine judgment; the Samaritans, however, were living a life of apostasy and instead of seeking God through repentance of their idolatry were confident that a mere alliance with the Kingdom of Judah could bring them relief from Syrian oppression.

    These ancient realities are there and provide the paradigm for today.

    The spirit of jealousy came on this nation in the second Clinton administration in a big way. His narrow escape from impeachment aroused the people to a righteous indignation that is still swelling. We do have a right (as "we people") to be angry that our property in our own government has been violated.

    But we must be aware that the false representation of who "we" are as a nation is operating under a systematic guise, where they who "stand for" the underdog are, like Ahab, deceived as to whose rights they themselves are exercising.

    This false representation - or false advocacy - is one that is empowered by occult and evil forces that cannot be addressed by means merely political. We as a people are being called upon by "all that is good" to discern the behind-the-scenes activity that is the real oppression.

    Its victims are the deceived. They have the same civil rights as we, to access the halls of power. But until we learn that they are deceived and find out whether we ourselves are possessed of a spirit of jealousy, our capacity to exercise conjoined efforts for that good we know we are heirs to, in a republic that is a true commonwealth after the Lincoln model, is still going to be very much reduced from what it must be to win that desired state back.

    Lincoln was (I think) deliberately quoting in his famous Gettysburg address from the phrase first printed in 1385. "A government of the people, by the people, and for the people" was written by John Wycliffe in the preface to his English Bible as "a book for" such government.

    He fought against an entrenched, oppressive regime that was deceived into thinking it had the exclusive divine right to administer the blessings of heaven but in reality was monopolizing an economic system by restricting access to the means of production and a political system structured by feudal fealties that coexisted under a perennial tension well known to history.

    Wycliffe lost his life - after losing his team and then his liberty. He could not, I think, have ever lost his awareness that the life of the soul is graced with knowledge of the holy, and knowledge of eternity through the Word of God that they were diligent to learn and teach.

    In that Word we find, in Paul's Letter to the Romans, the prototype for Lincoln's address.

    Due to constraints of time and space I must wrest it from its glorious context! But don't let me stop you from reading what precedes it!

    "O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
    For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counselor?
    Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
    For of him, and through him, and to him are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen."

    This is in Romans 11: 33-36. If the derivation is as I think, then we the people are the government's right god: we are its creator, we are its means of existence, and we are its judge.

    The government that we serve, will never be a government that was founded by our founders, and anyone who intends to transform this government into an Ahab is a traitor.

Great News from Virginia today!

Richard Viguerie Calls Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli a New Breed of Republican Leader
 
Contact: Bob Sturm, 703-396-6974; after 6 PM Eastern & on weekends, 703-307-8176

MANASSAS, Va., Dec. 13, 2010 /Christian Newswire/ -- The following is a statement from Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, regarding the leadership role of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli in challenging the new health care law that was declared unconstitutional by a federal district court:

"With his court victory over Obamacare, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has taken his place on the national stage as an important conservative leader.

"Cuccinelli joins a growing number of recently-elected young conservatives who will redefine the Republican Party.

"For decades, the number one need for conservatives has been young principled leaders. Recent elections have greatly increased the number of young conservatives who will soon become the face of the GOP. These include Sarah Palin, Tim Scott, Susana Martinez, Marco Rubio, Mike Lee, Nikki Haley, and many others.

"Ever since Ronald Reagan left the presidency, the face of the GOP has been establishment, status quo, big-government (but not quite as big as Democrats want) politicians, epitomized by Bob Dole, John McCain, Bill Frist, Denny Hastert, Tom Delay, and Bush 41 and 43.

"There wasn't a small-government constitutional conservative in the entire batch."

NOTE TO EDITORS: Richard A. Viguerie pioneered political direct mail and has been called "one of the creators of the modern conservative movement" (The Nation magazine) and one of the "conservatives of the century"(Washington Times). He is the author of Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause.

http://www.earnedmedia.org/ata12132.htm

The original "GroupThink"

    It seems to me that I remember vividly now: at one point during the Bush Administration the democrat-leaning talking heads in Media were all excited about a new critique of the White House - along with being "too secretive" they were somehow guilty of a (suspect) mode of thought that was characterized by its very groupiness.
    Last time I looked, admittedly a great while ago, the foundations of Democracy in ancient Greece were that power to the people would come through uniformity of action as a deme. But the current panic on Capitol Hill that has spread to those talking heads is expressing itself in a longing for a new kind of freedom.
    It's freedom from independence of thought. "Save us, O mighty Deme," they cry, from having to think through the consequences of our actions upon our personal lives!"
    Perhaps they have not yet realized (will they ever?) that the origins of American democracy lay in freedoms far different than the Classical aspirations to liberty against tyranny.
    Customary, communal thought-ways and the obligatory expressions of emotion that underlay the ancient coherence of political formats were not necessarily counter-productive to individual freedom of thought, as their writers demonstrated in works that have survived.
    But this new slavery to conformist thinking is just that. Antipathy to the TEA party as a knee-jerk reaction of today's Beautiful People is held by their opinion leaders to be progressive. Well, as a snowball downhill.

Mr. Boehner quoted in the news

Dear Rep. Boehner,
    Yesterday and Thursday night the news reports were full of your comments about the stimulus "not delivering what was promised."
    These two words in conjunction are a real shock to me coming from the Minority Leader. How can you allow the aggressors to establish the terms of the debate? There is a trenchant lie embedded in the relationship between the "promise" and the "hope" that Mr. Obama ran on for his presidency. That lie is that government grown yet larger can better satisfy the needs of the people of this nation.
    Why did you not point out that "delivering" on a "promise" of huge government spending only exacerbates the illusion of the Democratic Party's being accountable to the people? Why do you participate in perpetuating this gross lie? Have you been around Washington so long that you don't remember what it is like to be a mere citizen?
    I have participated in Massachusetts politics to the extent of running a campaign for State Representative (2004) and I will continue to hope that you make and keep good friends who are working with the TEA party movement, so you don't lose touch with the realities out here on the ground. Please re-think what you've said and don't let the sneaky news media who are always out to twist your words, make you sound so stupid as they've done.
    My counsel is to call a news conference and de-construct your sound bite with a good 11-minute speech about the upcoming elections - bring home the point that it's the private sector and private initiative and private citizens that are the source of hope for this country.

Thank you
Dave Funnell

This is getting so little real press: are we getting inured to silence on screamingly egregious policies?

The State Department is about to send Rauf’s wife and Cordoba Initiative fellow director, Daisy Khan, on her own taxpayer-funded “public diplomacy” trip to the United Arab Emirate... Such news from Brigitte Gabriel's ACT for America comes under the headline, "CASHING IN ON GROUND ZERO." Please, folks. Sign up for her newsletter, sign up for others like David Horowitz's Freedom Center, etc. and pass along what you're learning to your friends!

I say, even the term GROUND ZERO is a euphemism.

Why cannot anyone in the media - high or low - get it? Nine years after the fact, the MASSACRE at the World Trade Towers has not been properly so called. Was any massacre in history more of a massacre than this was?